Was the Baptist church kept "underground" by the Catholic Church until the Reformation?
Full Question
I have recently been
talking, via e-mail, to a Baptist minister who claims that not only was
St. Peter himself a Baptist preacher, but the original Church was
Baptist. He claims that Baptists are not Protestant and never belonged
to the "Roman Harlot." According to his revisionist account of history,
the Baptists had been underground until the Reformation. How can I
respond to this outrageous claim? I tried to show the minister that his
claims contradict history, but he believes history to be "Roman
propaganda."
Answer
You
recognize that this minister's conclusions are not drawn from an
examination of the record but from private prejudices. He knows, at
least, that the Protestant churches are derived historically from the
Catholic Church. His animus against the Church is so great that he
refuses to have even the remotest connection with Catholicism. So what
does he do? He falls back on the sorry notion that his Church wasn't
founded by our Lord, but by John the Baptist. (Most Baptists don't
believe this, but a few do.) But this causes a problem. In Matthew 16
our Lord says that he "will" (future tense) establish a Church, meaning
that John the Baptist, by then dead, could not have established the
Church of which Christ is the head. Conclusion? This Baptist minister
isn't a member of the Church Christ founded and isn't a member of any
church derived from it. Does this mean, by his own argument, that he
isn't a Christian at all?
Answered by: Karl Keating
No comments:
Post a Comment